When we consider the topic of buying a cheap smartphone, the first thing that comes to mind is money and user-friendliness. But is a cheap smartphone really the best option when it comes to make your life a little easier. This essay will look into the advantages and disadvantages of buying a cheap smartphone.
Many argue that buying a cheap smartphone is the wisest choice as it allows you to save money to invest in other things and there is no denying that a cheap smartphone is also a reasonable course of action for those who wish to be able to handle it easily. Yet, there are factors like having access to more tools or more storage capacity that should also be taken into account in order to make the best choice. There is much more to life than just money or user-friendliness. According to the latest research, 75% of people value having access to a huge range of apps and tools over saving money. Also, if you consider the fact that a high storage capacity plays a crucial role in your life due to that allows you to save lots of photos, music or e-books, then a cheap smartphone does not seem to be such a great idea after all. Moreover, expensive smartphones has two additional major advantages, namely good cameras and screen resolution. If taking great photos or recording videos in high quality ranks high on your priority list, then a cheap smartphone should definitely be out of the question. And last, but certainly not least, you must consider whether watching movies in streaming on a poor quality screen is an issue for you. If so, then an expensive smartphone is likely to be a much better option for you. To sum up, although on the face of it a cheap smartphone sounds like a good idea when it comes to make your life a little easier, a more in-depth analysis suggests otherwise. In fact, most evidence points to the fact that if having access to more tools, high storage capacity, good camera and screen is what you are after, then an expensive smartphone will probably work best for you.
1 Comment
R1+ ECONOMIC GROWTH
R2+ SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT R1-PRESERVING THEIR LIFESTYLE R2-STRESS FREE MIND R3- CULTURAL TRADITIONS R4- ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION When we consider the topic of mass tourism in Mount Everest, the first thing that comes to mind is economic growth and social development. But is mass tourism really the best option when it comes to making the best for local people. This essay will look into the advantages and disadvantages of mass tourism in Mount Everest. Many argue that mass tourism is the wisest choice as it allows local people to making a living from tourism and there is no denying that mass tourism is also a reasonable course of action for those who wish to get access to better and newer social services. Yet, there are factors like preserving their lifestyle or having a stress-free mind that should also be taken into account in order to make the best choice. There is much more to life than just easy money or getting access to new services such as internet. According to the latest research, 75% of local people value preserving their lifestyle over economic growth. Also, if l consider the fact that not having to constantly been In a rush plays a crucial role in keeping your stress levels at check, then mass tourism does not seem to be such a great idea after all. Moreover, to implant a regulated tourism has two additional major advantages, namely local people would be able to maintain their cultural traditions and environmental conservation. If keeping cultural traditions ranks high on local’s people priority list, then mass tourism should definitely be out of the question. And last, but certainly not least, they must consider whether pollution, and climatic change’s effects are an issue for them. If so, then a regulated tourism is likely to be a much better option for local people. To sum up, although on the face of it mass tourism sounds like a good idea when it comes to developing a society, a more in-depth analysis suggests otherwise. In fact, most evidence points to the fact that if preserving their lifestyle, low stress level, keeping local culture and environmental conservation is what they are after, then being a regulated tourism will probably work best for them. Dear Sir / Madam,
Dear Madam
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |